<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>What&#039;s on my mind &#187; response times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonhassall.com/articles/tag/response-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonhassall.com/articles</link>
	<description>What&#039;s on my mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:37:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Virtual Server Response Times</title>
		<link>http://www.jonhassall.com/articles/webtech/virtual-server-response-times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jonhassall.com/articles/webtech/virtual-server-response-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hassall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[response times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonhassall.com/articles/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used Pingdom to test the response time of an Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instance and a DynDNS Spring Server. Both are virtual server offerings. DynDNS’s Spring Server was marginally faster in terms of ping response time.
After using both for the past few months, I have found that the DynDNS Spring Server is much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used <a href="http://www.pingdom.com/">Pingdom</a> to test the response time of an <a href="http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/">Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud)</a> instance and a <a href="http://www.dyndns.com/services/springserver/">DynDNS Spring Server</a>. Both are virtual server offerings. DynDNS’s Spring Server was marginally faster in terms of ping response time.</p>
<p>After using both for the past few months, I have found that the DynDNS Spring Server is much easier to get started with initially, but Amazon’s EC2 is much more flexible.</p>
<div id="attachment_50" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px;  border: 1px solid #dddddd; background-color: #f3f3f3; padding-top: 4px; margin: 10px; text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.jonhassall.com/articles/articles-data//2009/07/pingdom-1.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-50" title="Pingdom response times for Amazon EC2 server" src="http://www.jonhassall.com/articles/articles-data//2009/07/pingdom-1.png" alt="Pingdom response times for Amazon EC2 server" width="300" height="285" /></a><p style=' padding: 0 4px 5px; margin: 0;'  class="wp-caption-text">Pingdom response times for Amazon EC2 server</p></div>
<div id="attachment_51" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px;  border: 1px solid #dddddd; background-color: #f3f3f3; padding-top: 4px; margin: 10px; text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.jonhassall.com/articles/articles-data//2009/07/pingdom-2.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-51" title="Pingdom response times for DynDNS Spring Server" src="http://www.jonhassall.com/articles/articles-data//2009/07/pingdom-2.png" alt="Pingdom response times for DynDNS Spring Server" width="300" height="288" /></a><p style=' padding: 0 4px 5px; margin: 0;'  class="wp-caption-text">Pingdom response times for DynDNS Spring Server</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jonhassall.com/articles/webtech/virtual-server-response-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
